County of Monmouth Seal

MONMOUTH COUNTY

Rumson-Sea Bright Bridge S-32 Project

on Rumson Road (CR520) over Shrewsbury River

Borough of Rumson and Borough of Sea Bright, New Jersey

Rumson-Sea Bright Bridge S-32 Project

on Rumson Road (CR520) over Shrewsbury River

[mk_page_section bg_image=”http://monmouthcountybridgenj.stokescreativegroupinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/dscn2097-1.jpg” bg_position=”center center” bg_repeat=”no-repeat” bg_stretch=”true” min_height=”250″ full_width=”true” padding_top=”0″ padding_bottom=”0″ sidebar=”cs-1″][vc_column][/vc_column][/mk_page_section][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1518657304530{margin-bottom: 20px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text el_class=”border” css=”.vc_custom_1537388445593{margin-bottom: 0px !important;padding-top: 35px !important;}”]

Project Overview

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1537388468425{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Local Concept Development Phase (LCD)

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1537388484194{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Monmouth County conducted a study of the existing Rumson-Sea Bright Bridge (S-32) on Rumson Road over the Shrewsbury River to improve its structural deficiencies and maintain an important transportation connection for residents and commuters in who travel to and from business and residential areas on both sides of the Shrewsbury River.  The bridge has been temporarily closed in recent years for structural and mechanical repairs.  Due to its age, the bridge has deteriorated over time and routine maintenance can no longer address the deficiencies.

This Local Concept Development Study was conducted as the first step to bridge improvements. The costs are too great for Monmouth County, so Federal funding is required.  An application was filed with the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) who oversees this phase of the project, known as Local Concept Development (LCD). [/vc_column_text][vc_column_text el_class=”lcpd” css=”.vc_custom_1521035116077{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Local Capital Project Delivery Process

1. Local Concept Development 2. Local Preliminary Engineering 3. Final Design/ROW Acquisition 4. Construction
Purpose & Need Statement Approved Design Exception Report Construction Contract Documents & PS&E Package Completed Construction
Data Collection & Environmental Screening Report Cost Estimates (Final Design, ROW & Construction) Environmental Reevaluations As-Built
Selection of Preliminary Preferred Alternative Approved Environmental Document Environmental Permits Update & Finalize Design Communications Report
Concept Development Report Approved Project Plan Acquisition on ROW Close-out Documentation
NEPA Classification Preliminary Engineering Report Update Design Communications Report  
Create Design Communications Report Update Design Communications Report    
Initial Public Outreach & Involvement Continued Public Outreach & Involvement Continued Public Outreach & Involvement Continued Public Outreach & Involvement

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row disable_element=”yes”][vc_column][mk_custom_list style=”mk-icon-circle-o” margin_bottom=”0″ el_class=”timeline”]

  • Project Kick-off (January 2018)
  • Data Collection (Early 2018): Review existing documentation, mapping and surveying, cultural resource report, etc.
  • Purpose and Needs Statement Developed (Early 2018)
  • Alternative Analysis (Mid 2018): Develop engineering alternatives and conduct impact assessment of alternatives
  • Selection of Preliminary Preferred Alternative (Late 2018)
  • Documentation (Late 2018/Early 2019): Prepare cost estimates, NEPA classification and documentation, preliminary engineering next steps, etc.
  • Draft Local Concept Development Report (Late 2018)
  • Final Local Concept Development Report (Late 2018)

[/mk_custom_list][mk_advanced_gmaps][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1518657224658{margin-bottom: 20px !important;}” id=”details”][vc_column][vc_accordions style=”simple-style” open_toggle=”-1″ container_bg_color=””][vc_accordion_tab icon=”mk-icon-info-circle” title=”Project Background”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1524149696900{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Location: Bernards and Long Hill Townships

About the Bridge:

The existing Valley Road Bridge over the Passaic River is a three-span concrete encased multi-stringer bridge built in 1931 with an approximate total span length of 100 feet. The bridge carries two 13.5’ lanes, one 2’ wide westbound shoulder, one 4’ wide eastbound shoulder and two 5.5’ wide sidewalks.[/vc_column_text][/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab icon=”mk-icon-flag” title=”LCD Project Steps “][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1557879465088{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Step 1 – Evaluate Existing Conditions

Data on existing conditions, including bridge condition, traffic conditions, crash data, local demographics and environmental information, will be collected to help identify the study’s purpose and need as well as the study team’s goals and objectives.

Step 2 – Develop Purpose and Need Statement

A Purpose and Need statement will be developed early in the project development process.  This statement outlines goals and objectives that should be included as part of a successful solution to the problem and sets the stage for the development of alternatives.

Step 3 – Develop an Alternatives Analysis

During the Alternatives Analysis process, a range of alternatives will be developed and evaluated to ensure that all options have been considered before selection of the Preliminary Preferred Alternative (PPA). The intention of Alternatives Analysis is to satisfy the identified project objectives while minimizing impacts to environmental features, access driveways and adjacent intersections. The conceptual alternatives may include a “No-Build” alternative, rehabilitation alternative or full replacement alternative.

Step 4 – Select a Preliminary Preferred Alternative (PPA)

A PPA will be recommended based on data from public outreach, existing conditions, environmental screening, constructability, anticipated impacts and estimated construction costs. A conceptual plan for the PPA will be developed for the final Concept Development Report. Once a PPA is recommended with resolution of support by the municipalities and the County, and with concurrence from the Inter-Agency Review Committee (IRC), the project would move to Preliminary Engineering.[/vc_column_text][/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab icon=”mk-icon-leaf” title=”Environmental Process”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1557879525118{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Federally-funded projects require an environmental screening that follows the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.  The NEPA process enables the project sponsor to establish existing socioeconomic and environmental conditions in the study area and weigh the potential impacts that may be caused by the range of alternatives under consideration. When analyzing the alternatives, federal and state regulations require careful assessment and mitigation or avoidance of the potential negative environmental impacts. Environmental resources analyzed include air, noise, hazardous or contaminated sites, parks, wetlands, water resources, social and economic impacts, and cultural resources such as historic structures and facilities.[/vc_column_text][/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab icon=”mk-icon-comments-o” title=”Community Outreach”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1557879554090{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Local officials, community stakeholders, agency representatives and the general public will have an opportunity to provide comments and questions for consideration throughout the study. The primary tasks of stakeholders include the following:

  • Assist in the development of the Project Purpose and Need statement
  • Assist in the development of conceptual alternatives
  • Assist in the recommendation of the Preliminary Preferred Alternative (PPA) based on the Project Purpose and Need

Learn more about Community Outreach[/vc_column_text][/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab icon=”mk-icon-calendar” title=”LCD Project Schedule “][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1519750000036{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Develop Purpose and Needs Statement: Early 2018

Develop Alternatives Analysis: Mid 2018

Selection of Preliminary Preferred Alternative: Late 2018

Documentation: Late 2018/Early 2019

Final Local Concept Development Report: Early 2019[/vc_column_text][/vc_accordion_tab][/vc_accordions][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1518657246211{margin-bottom: 25px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text margin_bottom=”15″ css=”.vc_custom_1519850880455{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Local Capital Project Delivery (LCPD) Program

The LCD Study is the first phase for federally funded transportation improvement projects. The LCPD Program provides funding to NJTPA sub regions—the 15 city and county members of the NJTPA—to prepare proposed transportation projects for eventual construction with federal funding.

This preparation involves completing the multi-step Capital Project Delivery Process developed by NJDOT. This process is designed to streamline project development and provide a common and consistent framework for federally funded projects at the local, regional and state level.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row id=”team”][vc_column][vc_column_text margin_bottom=”15″ css=”.vc_custom_1518690890221{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Project Team

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner attached=”true” el_class=”bw logo” css=”.vc_custom_1519754308046{padding-bottom: 20px !important;}”][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1519754169675{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1521824223740{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1519754197074{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1519754209506{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1557879333796{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]The Project Team is composed of members representing Somerset and Morris Counties, NJTPA, NJDOT, McCormick Taylor (the prime consultant design engineering firm) and other supporting consulting firms for engineering, environmental, cultural and community involvement support. See directory of project team staff and contact information below:

Richard Brundage, P.E.
North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority
Project Manager
rbrundage@njtpa.org
Sascha Frimpong
North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority
Manager, Local Programs
sfrimpong@njtpa.org
Meghan Paccione (Primary Contact)
Morris County Senior Engineer
mpaccione@co.morris.nj.us
Brian Maurer (Primary Contact)
Somerset County Principal Bridge Engineer
maurer@co.somerset.nj.us
Christopher Vitz
Morris County Director of Public Works & County Engineer
cvitz@co.morris.nj.us
Roslyn Khurdan
Morris County Assistant County Engineer
rkhurdan@co.morris.nj.us
Deval Desai
New Jersey Department of Transportation
deval.desai@dot.nj.gov
Pamela Garrett
New Jersey Department of Transportation
pamela.garrett@dot.nj.gov

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1518690942575{margin-bottom: 25px !important;}” id=”team”][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row]